The Common Lisp Cookbook – Functions

Table of Contents

The Common Lisp Cookbook – Functions

šŸ“¢ These years in Common Lisp: 2023-2024 in review.

šŸ“• Get the EPUB and PDF

Named functions: defun

Creating named functions is done with the defun keyword. It follows this model:

(defun function-name (zero or some arguments)
  "docstring"
  (code of function body))

The return value is the value returned by the last expression of the body (see below for more). There is no ā€œreturn xxā€ statement.

So, for example:

(defun hello-world ()
  ;;               ^^ no arguments
  (print "hello world!"))

Call it:

(hello-world)
;; "hello world!"  <-- output
;; "hello world!"  <-- a string is returned.

The print function prints its one argument to standard output and returns it. ā€œhello worldā€ is thus the returned value of our function.

Arguments

Base case: required arguments

Add in arguments like this:

(defun hello (name)
  "Say hello to `name'."
  (format t "hello ~a !~&" name))
;; HELLO

(where ~a is the most used format directive to print a variable aesthetically and ~& prints a newline)

Call the function:

(hello "me")
;; hello me !  <-- this is printed by `format`
;; NIL         <-- return value: `format t` prints a string
;;                 to standard output and returns nil.

If you donā€™t specify the right amount of arguments, youā€™ll be trapped into the interactive debugger with an explicit error message:

(hello)

invalid number of arguments: 0

Optional arguments: &optional

Optional arguments are declared after the &optional keyword in the lambda list. They are ordered, they must appear one after another.

This function:

(defun hello (name &optional age gender) ā€¦)

must be called like this:

(hello "me") ;; a value for the required argument,
             ;; zero optional arguments
(hello "me" "7")  ;; a value for age
(hello "me" 7 :h) ;; a value for age and gender

Named parameters: &key

It is not always convenient to remember the order of the arguments. It is thus possible to supply arguments by name: we declare them using &key argname, we set them with :argname "value" in the function call, and we use argname as a regular variable in the function body.

Key arguments are nil by default.

(defun hello (name &key happy)
  "If `happy' is `t', print a smiley"
  (format t "hello ~a " name)
  (when happy
    (format t ":)~&")))

The following calls are possible:

(hello "me")
(hello "me" :happy t)
(hello "me" :happy nil) ;; useless, equivalent to (hello "me")

and this is not valid: (hello "me" :happy):

odd number of &KEY arguments

A similar example of a function declaration, with several key parameters:

(defun hello (name &key happy lisper cookbook-contributor-p) ā€¦)

it can be called with zero or more key parameters, in any order:

(hello "me" :lisper t)
(hello "me" :lisper t :happy t)
(hello "me" :cookbook-contributor-p t :happy t)

Last but not least, you would quickly realize it, but we can choose the keys programmatically (they can be variables):

(let ((key :happy)
      (val t))
  (hello "me" key val))
;; hello me :)
;; NIL

Mixing optional and key parameters

It is generally a style warning, but it is possible.

(defun hello (&optional name &key happy)
  (format t "hello ~a " name)
  (when happy
    (format t ":)~&")))

In SBCL, this yields:

; in: DEFUN HELLO
;     (SB-INT:NAMED-LAMBDA HELLO
;         (&OPTIONAL NAME &KEY HAPPY)
;       (BLOCK HELLO (FORMAT T "hello ~a " NAME) (WHEN HAPPY (FORMAT T ":)~&"))))
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
;   &OPTIONAL and &KEY found in the same lambda list: (&OPTIONAL (NAME "John") &KEY
;                                                      HAPPY)
;
; compilation unit finished
;   caught 1 STYLE-WARNING condition

We can call it:

(hello "me" :happy t)
;; hello me :)
;; NIL

Default values to key parameters

In the lambda list, use pairs to give a default value to an optional or a key argument, like (happy t) below:

(defun hello (name &key (happy t))

Now happy is true by default.

Was a key parameter specified?

You can skip this tip for now if you want, but come back later to it as it can turn handy.

We saw that a default key parameter is nil by default ((defun hello (name &key happy) ā€¦)). But how can be distinguish between ā€œthe value is NIL by defaultā€ and ā€œthe user wants it to be NILā€?

We saw how to use a tuple to set its default value:

&key (happy t)

To answer our question, use a triple like this:

&key (happy t happy-p)

where happy-p serves as a predicate variable (using -p is only a convention, give it the name you want) to know if the key was supplied. If it was, then it will be T.

So now, we will print a sad face if :happy was explicitely set to NIL. We donā€™t print it by default.

(defun hello (name &key (happy nil happy-p))
  (format t "Key supplied? ~a~&" happy-p)
  (format t "hello ~a " name)
  (when happy-p
    (if happy
      (format t ":)")
      (format t ":("))))

Variable number of arguments: &rest

Sometimes you want a function to accept a variable number of arguments. Use &rest <variable>, where <variable> will be a list.

(defun mean (x &rest numbers)
    (/ (apply #'+ x numbers)
       (1+ (length numbers))))
(mean 1)
(mean 1 2)  ;; => 3/2 (yes, it is printed as a ratio)
(mean 1 2 3 4 5) ;;  => 3

Defining key arguments, and allowing more: &allow-other-keys

Observe:

(defun hello (name &key happy)
  (format t "hello ~a~&" name))

(hello "me" :lisper t)
;; => Error: unknown keyword argument

whereas

(defun hello (name &key happy &allow-other-keys)
  (format t "hello ~a~&" name))

(hello "me" :lisper t)
;; hello me

We might need &allow-other-keys when passing around arguments or with higher level manipulation of functions.

Hereā€™s a real example. We define a function to open a file that always uses :if-exists :supersede, but still passes any other keys to the open function.

(defun open-supersede (f &rest other-keys &key &allow-other-keys)
  (apply #'open f :if-exists :supersede other-keys))

In the case of a duplicated :if-exists argument, our first one takes precedence.

Return values

The return value of the function is the value returned by the last executed form of the body.

There are ways for non-local exits (return-from <function name> <value>), but they are usually not needed.

Common Lisp has also the concept of multiple return values.

Multiple return values

Returning multiple values is not like returning a tuple or a list of results.

Quick example

Letā€™s define a function that returns one value:

(defun foo ()
  :a)

now we set the result of calling this function to a variable:

(defparameter *var* (foo))

*var* is now :a. Thatā€™s a very classical behaviour.

Now our function will return multiple values, using values:

(foo ()
  (values :a :b :c))

and we set *var* to its result again:

(setf *var* (foo))

What is the value of *var*? It is still :a. We didnā€™t ask to capture the remaining values, so :b and :c were discarded.

This is actually very handy: you can change a function to return more multiple values than it did, and you donā€™t need to change and refactor the call sites.

Returning multiple values: values

The function values is used to return multiple values:

(values 'a 'b)
;; => A
;; => B

Calling values with no arguments returns no value at all.

It is different than returning nil.

Unless you use the functions described below to capture multiple values, only the first will be seen and used by other functions:

(+ (values 1 2 3) (values 10 20 30))
;; => 11

values does not create a list.

Why multiple values. A look at CL built-ins

While most Common Lisp forms return a single value, it is sometimes useful for a function to return several (or none).

For example, round returns two values, the rounded result as well as how much was removed to do the rounding:

(round 10.33333333)
;; => 10
;; => 0.33333302

Most of the time you only need the rounded value, but if for some reason you want to know the remainder, it can be captured. If you expect all the values calculated by a function to be used most of the time, then it is better to bundle up the results in a list, a CLOS instance, etc., and return that. Only use multiple values when the first values are most often needed, and the later ones less often used.

Similarly, getting the content of a hash-table returns two values: the result, and a boolean saying if the key was found or not. See below.

Capturing multiple values: multiple-value-bind, nth-value, multiple-value-list et all

The most common way to capture multiple values is with multiple-value-bind:

(multiple-value-bind (c d) (values 1 2)
  (list c d))
;; => (1 2)

The number of values returned does not have to match the number of variables to bind. If there are too many values, the extras are discarded, and if there are too many variables to bind, the extras are set to nil:

(multiple-value-bind (a b) (values 1 2 3 4)
  (list a b))
;; =>(1 2)
(multiple-value-bind (a b) (values 1)
  (list a b))
;; => (1 NIL)

The function values is setf-able, which can also be used to capture values:

(let (c d)
  (setf (values c d) (values 1 2))
  (list c d))
;; => (1 2)

Or you can shunt multiple values directly into a function call with multiple-value-call:

(multiple-value-call #'list (values 1 2 3))
;; => (1 2 3)

The function multiple-value-list is equivalent to the code above:

(multiple-value-list (values 1 2 3))
;; => (1 2 3)

And you can go the other way, turning a list into multiple return values with values-list:

(values-list '(1 2 3))
;; => 1
;; => 2
;; => 3

You can select a particular value with nth-value:

(nth-value 0 (values :a :b :c))  ;; => :A
(nth-value 2 (values :a :b :c))  ;; => :C
(nth-value 9 (values :a :b :c))  ;; => NIL

Note here too and let us stress again that values is different from a list:

(nth-value 0 (list :a :b :c)) ;; => (:A :B :C)
;; => a list is one data structure of its own

(nth-value 1 (list :a :b :c)) ;; => NIL
;; => no second value to capture

Using multiple values to report success or failure

A typical use for multiple values is to distinguish between finding nil and a lookup failure. For example, gethash returns two values. The first is the result of the lookup, which might be nil if nothing is found, but could be an actual nil stored in the hashtable. The second value returned is a flag indicating if the lookup was a success:

(defvar *hash* (make-hash-table))
(setf (gethash 'a *hash*) 12)
(setf (gethash 'b *hash*) nil)
(gethash 'a *hash*)
;; => 12           <--- first returned value: our result
;; => T            <--- second returned value: the key was found

(gethash 'b *hash*)
;; => NIL
;; => T

(gethash 'c *hash*)
;; => NIL
;; => NIL          <---- this key wasn't found.

Anonymous functions: lambda

Anonymous functions are created with lambda:

(lambda (x) (print x))

We can call a lambda with funcall or apply (see below).

If the first element of an unquoted list is a lambda expression, the lambda is called:

((lambda (x) (print x)) "hello")
;; hello

Calling functions programmatically: funcall and apply

funcall is to be used with a known number of arguments, when apply can be used on a list, for example from &rest:

(funcall #'+ 1 2)
(apply #'+ '(1 2))

There is one thing to keep in mind with apply, it is that we canā€™t use it with super-large lists: the argument list of functions have a length limit.

We can find this limit in the variable call-arguments-limit. It depends on the implementation. While it is rather large on SBCL (4611686018427387903), we have another option to apply a function with arguments of arbitrary length: reduce.

reduce

reduce is used to apply functions on lists and vectors of arbitrary length. It repeateadly calls the function with two arguments and walks over the argument list.

For example, instead of using apply like above:

(apply #'min '(22 1 2 3)) ;; imagine a super large list

we can use reduce:

(reduce #'min '(22 1 2 3))

If our argument was 1000 elements long, apply would call the min function with 1000 arguments, while reduce would call min (nearly) a 1000 times with 2 arguments each time.

reduce walks over the list, which means the following:

Look, we can trace it:

CL-USER> (trace min)
CL-USER> (reduce #'min '(22 1 2 3))
  0: (MIN 22 1)
  0: MIN returned 1
  0: (MIN 1 2)
  0: MIN returned 1
  0: (MIN 1 3)
  0: MIN returned 1
1

Its full signature is the following:

(reduce function sequence &key key from-end start end initial-value)

where key, from-end, start and end are key arguments found in other built-in functions (see our data-structures chapter). If given, :initial-value is placed before the first subsequence.

Read more about reduce on the Community Spec:

Referencing functions by name: single quote ' or sharpsign-quote #'?

In the example above, we used #', but a single quote also works, and we can encounter it in the wild. Which one to use?

It is generally safer to use #', because it respects lexical scope. Observe:

(defun foo (x)
  (* x 100))

(flet ((foo (x) (1+ x)))
  (funcall #'foo 1))
;; => 2, as expected

;; But:

(flet ((foo (x) (1+ x)))
  (funcall 'foo 1))
;; => 100

#' is actually the shorthand for (function ā€¦):

(function +)
;; #<FUNCTION +>

(flet ((foo (x) (1+ x)))
  (print (function foo))
  (funcall (function foo) 1))
;; #<FUNCTION (FLET FOO) {1001C0ACFB}>
;; 2

Using function or the #' shorthand allows us to refer to local functions. If we pass instead a symbol to funcall, what is called is always the function named by that symbol in the global environment.

In addition, #' catches the function by value. If the function is redefined, bindings that refered to this function by #' will still run its original behaviour.

Letā€™s assign a function to a parameter:

(defparameter *foo-caller* #'foo)
(funcall *foo-caller* 1)
;; => 100

Now, if we redefine foo, the behaviour of *foo-caller* will not change:

(defun foo (x) (1+ x))
;; WARNING: redefining CL-USER::FOO in DEFUN
;; FOO

(funcall *foo-caller* 1)
;; 100  ;; and not 2

If we bind the caller with 'foo, a single quote, the function will be resolved at runtime:

(defun foo (x) (* x 100))  ;; back to original behavior.
(defparameter *foo-caller-2* 'foo)
;; *FOO-CALLER-2*
(funcall *foo-caller-2* 1)
;; 100

;; We change the definition:
(defun foo (x) (1+ x))
;; WARNING: redefining CL-USER::FOO in DEFUN
;; FOO

;; We try again:
(funcall *foo-caller-2* 1)
;; 2

The behaviour you want depends on your use case. Generally, using sharpsign-quote is less surprising. But if you are running a tight loop and you want live-update mechanisms (think a game or live visualisations), you might want to use a single quote so that your loop picks up the userā€™s new function definition.

Higher order functions: functions that return functions

Writing functions that return functions is simple enough:

(defun adder (n)
  (lambda (x) (+ x n)))
;; ADDER

Here we have defined the function adder which returns an object of type function.

To call the resulting function, we must use funcall or apply:

(adder 5)
;; #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA (X) :IN ADDER) {100994ACDB}>
(funcall (adder 5) 3)
;; 8

Trying to call it right away leads to an illegal function call:

((adder 3) 5)
In: (ADDER 3) 5
    ((ADDER 3) 5)
Error: Illegal function call.

Indeed, CL has different namespaces for functions and variables, i.e. the same name can refer to different things depending on its position in a form thatā€™s evaluated.

;; The symbol foo is bound to nothing:
CL-USER> (boundp 'foo)
NIL
CL-USER> (fboundp 'foo)
NIL
;; We create a variable:
CL-USER> (defparameter foo 42)
FOO
* foo
42
;; Now foo is "bound":
CL-USER> (boundp 'foo)
T
;; but still not as a function:
CL-USER> (fboundp 'foo)
NIL
;; So let's define a function:
CL-USER> (defun foo (x) (* x x))
FOO
;; Now the symbol foo is bound as a function too:
CL-USER> (fboundp 'foo)
T
;; Get the function:
CL-USER> (function foo)
#<FUNCTION FOO>
;; and the shorthand notation:
* #'foo
#<FUNCTION FOO>
;; We call it:
(funcall (function adder) 5)
#<CLOSURE (LAMBDA (X) :IN ADDER) {100991761B}>
;; and call the lambda:
(funcall (funcall (function adder) 5) 3)
8

To simplify a bit, you can think of each symbol in CL having (at least) two ā€œcellsā€ in which information is stored. One cell - sometimes referred to as its value cell - can hold a value that is bound to this symbol, and you can use boundp to test whether the symbol is bound to a value (in the global environment). You can access the value cell of a symbol with symbol-value.

The other cell - sometimes referred to as its function cell - can hold the definition of the symbolā€™s (global) function binding. In this case, the symbol is said to be fbound to this definition. You can use fboundp to test whether a symbol is fbound. You can access the function cell of a symbol (in the global environment) with symbol-function.

Now, if a symbol is evaluated, it is treated as a variable in that its value cell is returned (just foo). If a compound form, i.e. a cons, is evaluated and its car is a symbol, then the function cell of this symbol is used (as in (foo 3)).

In Common Lisp, as opposed to Scheme, it is not possible that the car of the compound form to be evaluated is an arbitrary form. If it is not a symbol, it must be a lambda expression, which looks like (lambda lambda-list form*).

This explains the error message we got above - (adder 3) is neither a symbol nor a lambda expression.

If we want to be able to use the symbol *my-fun* in the car of a compound form, we have to explicitly store something in its function cell (which is normally done for us by the macro defun):

;;; continued from above
CL-USER> (fboundp '*my-fun*)
NIL
CL-USER> (setf (symbol-function '*my-fun*) (adder 3))
#<CLOSURE (LAMBDA (X) :IN ADDER) {10099A5EFB}>
CL-USER> (fboundp '*my-fun*)
T
CL-USER> (*my-fun* 5)
8

Read the CLHS section about form evaluation for more.

Closures

Closures allow you to capture lexical bindings. This can be useful to store state that you donā€™t want to have to keep passing into your function(s), either as a convenience or to keep state variables out of a reachable namespace.

(let ((limit 3)
      (counter -1))
    (defun my-counter ()
      (if (< counter limit)
          (incf counter)
          (setf counter 0))))

(my-counter)
0
(my-counter)
1
(my-counter)
2
(my-counter)
3
(my-counter)
0

Or similarly:

(defun repeater (n)
  (let ((counter -1))
     (lambda ()
       (if (< counter n)
         (incf counter)
         (setf counter 0)))))

(defparameter *my-repeater* (repeater 3))
;; *MY-REPEATER*
(funcall *my-repeater*)
0
(funcall *my-repeater*)
1
(funcall *my-repeater*)
2
(funcall *my-repeater*)
3
(funcall *my-repeater*)
0

In addition to counter generators, another common use of lexical closures is memoization ā€” caching previous results of functions that are expensive to calculate. Using the non-memoized Fibonacci function below quickly gets quite time-consuting to calculate.

(defun fibonacci (n)
  (if (<= n 1)
      n
      (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))

(time (fibonacci 40))
;; Evaluation took:
;;   2.843 seconds of real time
;;   2.841360 seconds of total run time (2.796188 user, 0.045172 system)
;;   99.93% CPU
;;   0 bytes consed
;; 102334155

Using a hash table to store previously calculated results can speed things up. We could use a defvar, but this is a good use case for a closure since that avoids adding a variable only used by one function to the namespace.

(let ((memo (make-hash-table)))
  (defun fibonacci (n)
    (let ((value (gethash n memo)))
      (cond ((<= n 1) n)
            (value value)
            (t (setf (gethash n memo)
                     (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))))))

(time (fibonacci 40))
;; Evaluation took:
;;   0.000 seconds of real time
;;   0.000016 seconds of total run time (0.000015 user, 0.000001 system)
;;   100.00% CPU
;;   0 bytes consed
;; 102334155

There are several memoization libraries, some of which wrap this lexical closure and caching mechanics up in a macro.

See more on Practical Common Lisp.

setf functions

A function name can also be a list of two symbols with setf as the first one, and where the first argument is the new value:

(defun (setf function-name) (new-value other optional arguments)
  body)

This mechanism is often used for CLOS methods.

Letā€™s work towards an example. Letā€™s say we manipulate a hash-table that represents a square. We store the square width in this hash-table:

(defparameter *square* (make-hash-table))
(setf (gethash :width *square*) 21)

During our program life cycle, we can change the square width, with setf as we did above.

We define a function to compute a square area. We donā€™t store it in the hash-table as it is redundant with the dimension.

(defun area (square)
  (expt (gethash :width square) 2))

Now, our programming needs lead to the situation where it would be very handy to change the area of the squareā€¦ and have this reflected on the squareā€™s dimensions. It can be ergonomic for your programā€™s application interface to define a setf-function, like this:

(defun (setf area) (new-area square)
  (let ((width (sqrt new-area)))
    (setf (gethash :width square) width)))

And now you can do:

(setf (area *SQUARE*) 100)
;; => 10.0

and check your square (describe, inspectā€¦), the new width was set.

Currying

Concept

A related concept is that of currying which you might be familiar with if youā€™re coming from a functional language. After weā€™ve read the last section thatā€™s rather easy to implement:

CL-USER> (defun curry (function &rest args)
           (lambda (&rest more-args)
	           (apply function (append args more-args))))
CURRY
CL-USER> (funcall (curry #'+ 3) 5)
8
CL-USER> (funcall (curry #'+ 3) 6)
9
CL-USER> (setf (symbol-function 'power-of-ten) (curry #'expt 10))
#<Interpreted Function "LAMBDA (FUNCTION &REST ARGS)" {482DB969}>
CL-USER> (power-of-ten 3)
1000

With the Alexandria library

Now that you know how to do it, you may appreciate using the implementation of the Alexandria library (in Quicklisp).

(ql:quickload "alexandria")

(defun adder (foo bar)
  "Add the two arguments."
  (+ foo bar))

(defvar add-one (alexandria:curry #'adder 1) "Add 1 to the argument.")

(funcall add-one 10)  ;; => 11

(setf (symbol-function 'add-one) add-one)
(add-one 10)  ;; => 11

Documentation

Page source: functions.md

T
O
C